![]() ![]() I found this code to convert the 10-bit “HDR” yuv420p10le colorspace down to the standard yuv420p 8-bit colorspace from the colourspace blog so props to them for having a handy guide just for this. Thus comparing the two encoders via their default 8-bit compressors. First thing I did was to chop out a minute segment and promptly remove the HDR. To find out I would need a lot of comparable data. ![]() So I had to ask myself: How much better is x265 than x264? But when I looked at the videos I was enjoying just fine at CRF 22, they were mostly coming out with less than a 10Mbps bitrate. Now I know that x265 can be around 50% more efficient than x264, and that YouTube needs it higher quality coming in so when they re-compress it it will still look good. They claim that a 4K video coming into their site should optimally be 35~45Mbps when encoded with the older x264 codecs. Then I recently read YouTubes suggest guidelines for bitrates. That way I know I should never be disappointed. Therefore I played it safe, bump it down a notch and just encode all of my stuff with x265 10-bit at CRF of 20 on Slow preset. Through some experimentation I found that I personally never can really see a difference between anything lower than 22 using a Slow present. It states that for 4K videos with x265 they suggest a Constant Rate Factor (CRF) encoding in the range of 22-28 (the larger the number the lower the quality). In the past, I went straight to Handbrake’s documentation. I mainly use Handbrake now use ffmpeg because I learned Handbrake only has a 8-bit internal pipeline. ![]() I want a setting that I can use on any incoming 4K HDR video I buy. The honest to god true answer is “it depends”, however I find that answer unsuitable for my own needs. ![]() What are the best settings for me to use when encoding x265 videos? What are the best settings for me to use when encoding x265 videos?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |